Too little water but the numbers are important
According the an article in The National Trust Magazine, Autumn 2008 page 60
“The average demand for household water has increased dramatically; we now use half much water again as we did in 1980.
This is pertly to do with lifestyle changes-almost most households now have washing machine, a third have a dish washer. Its easy to think that the UK has a plentiful supply of water, but many rivers and wetlands are dryng up. Such water shortages impact son wildlife where waster is required for fish, wetland birds and other wildlife to survive and prosper
Southern and eastern England are officially classed ‘serious water-stress zones’ by the Environment Agency, an south-eat England has less water available per head than the Sudan’’
I wonder how much increase in demand has to do with the rapid increase in population since 1980 and of course the introduction for such things as washing machines and luxury items like dishwashers into the home play a part, as does the increase of small business that require water along with there industrial sized washers and dish washers.
It is rather telling that per head the south east, the most densely populated area of the UK, has less water than the Sudan. I guess there is no accident in using such a reference to a desert land, as it seems to refer to the millions of immigrants from such desert lands that have assisted in the mass consumption of water supplies that have helped to reduce the South east, (the most densely populated and the area of choice for most newly arrived), to near desert availability of water, with all the consequences for life, wildlife and natural habitat that this brings.
Of course the endless expansion of developments of houses and businesses, restaurants and car washes don’t help neither does the mass of what I call transient populations that visit and leave and the services such as extensive hotel building that goes with ‘Globalisation’ of the UK.
I guess these things are the ‘lifestyle change’ or rather, demographic change that the writer of the National Trust must being referring to.
Thursday, 15 January 2009
Altruism as political power disguised as the greater ‘good’
Altruism as political power disguised as the greater ‘good’
Evoking Human Rights, Humanitarianism and such like we are supposed to see the highest good of society and indeed humanity. But in reality ‘Universal ‘Human rights is largely being used to protect any criminal, any foreigner and any dysfunctional and disenfranchised chronically poor individual or group and give them automatic rights to be brought into the country and given every amenity.
In reality Altruism is only a pretext of political goals in the pursuit of Globalism. Seeking to make the largest amount of worker consumers available anywhere in Europe at the lowest wage.
The governmental and EU wide mass immigration without any limit or filter has as its ‘altruistic’ purpose to end the right,of the indigenous people of each sovereign country to be put first, to have priority to jobs, services and care from its government in their own country. And yet and rather at the same time filling the population with criminals, undesirables and flotsam of the world giving them every amenity and at the same time creating high demand on space, causing overcrowding, drawing on limited resources and in many cases harming the host population.
Yet when this mass colonisation by the rest of the worlds poor and criminal and personal self – interested individuals is bringing indigenous people a minority social status and presence in their ancestral lands, being discriminated against in terms of jobs and being told that the white male working class lazy uneducated, that white girls should be sterilized and generally that , as said by a politician said ‘not worth saving’, all this amounting to an ongoing genocide, is exempt from a breach of human rights or rather the indigenous population have no right to demand human rights in the face of this genocidal attack on a race and culture. For this is deemed ‘racist’ that they should want to preserve their people, a quality of life and be free from the subjection to laws made outside their countrya and laws that put other races first
So Human rights and every kind of support and resource is readily available to anyone of a poor foreign, asylum seeker and criminal nature how can be preserved and given what ever they need. And when some suggest that a murderer or rapist, or terrorist be return to their country to face justice Human Rights are invoked and they are spared from doing it because they might be harmed. Yes, but human rights used thus would rather have the criminal have a cosy time, stay here and continue to harm one of the indigenous people of this country instead.
Human rights thus are used to swamp countries with immigrants for cheap labour large profit for a few and the destruction of any rights of indigenous peoples to their own land people and traditions and peace. All furthering a common globalising goals of the destruction of states sovereign countries and the ultimate essentiality communist Marxist goal of destroying nations and nationalism and homogenise races and so to slowly control and dominate them dividing and conquering by importing crime, diseases, violence, oppressive laws guarding every right of the other races, depriving of rights, surveillance of the indigenous people and criminalising free speech and any criticism of the mass immigration swamping and colonising of their people and countries.
Thus the outcome of the use of altruism and humanitarianism in reality in terms of quality of life is degrading and destructive serving the rich powerful Globalist agenda of the governments to make one mass multicultural divisive cess pit over which a one world government can have absolute power over all else such as culture, heritage and tradition and greatness of race, so that oligarchs can make large amounts of money and use up last remaining natural resources. This is all it comes down to. There is nothing moral, ‘humane’ or good about any of this.
Evoking Human Rights, Humanitarianism and such like we are supposed to see the highest good of society and indeed humanity. But in reality ‘Universal ‘Human rights is largely being used to protect any criminal, any foreigner and any dysfunctional and disenfranchised chronically poor individual or group and give them automatic rights to be brought into the country and given every amenity.
In reality Altruism is only a pretext of political goals in the pursuit of Globalism. Seeking to make the largest amount of worker consumers available anywhere in Europe at the lowest wage.
The governmental and EU wide mass immigration without any limit or filter has as its ‘altruistic’ purpose to end the right,of the indigenous people of each sovereign country to be put first, to have priority to jobs, services and care from its government in their own country. And yet and rather at the same time filling the population with criminals, undesirables and flotsam of the world giving them every amenity and at the same time creating high demand on space, causing overcrowding, drawing on limited resources and in many cases harming the host population.
Yet when this mass colonisation by the rest of the worlds poor and criminal and personal self – interested individuals is bringing indigenous people a minority social status and presence in their ancestral lands, being discriminated against in terms of jobs and being told that the white male working class lazy uneducated, that white girls should be sterilized and generally that , as said by a politician said ‘not worth saving’, all this amounting to an ongoing genocide, is exempt from a breach of human rights or rather the indigenous population have no right to demand human rights in the face of this genocidal attack on a race and culture. For this is deemed ‘racist’ that they should want to preserve their people, a quality of life and be free from the subjection to laws made outside their countrya and laws that put other races first
So Human rights and every kind of support and resource is readily available to anyone of a poor foreign, asylum seeker and criminal nature how can be preserved and given what ever they need. And when some suggest that a murderer or rapist, or terrorist be return to their country to face justice Human Rights are invoked and they are spared from doing it because they might be harmed. Yes, but human rights used thus would rather have the criminal have a cosy time, stay here and continue to harm one of the indigenous people of this country instead.
Human rights thus are used to swamp countries with immigrants for cheap labour large profit for a few and the destruction of any rights of indigenous peoples to their own land people and traditions and peace. All furthering a common globalising goals of the destruction of states sovereign countries and the ultimate essentiality communist Marxist goal of destroying nations and nationalism and homogenise races and so to slowly control and dominate them dividing and conquering by importing crime, diseases, violence, oppressive laws guarding every right of the other races, depriving of rights, surveillance of the indigenous people and criminalising free speech and any criticism of the mass immigration swamping and colonising of their people and countries.
Thus the outcome of the use of altruism and humanitarianism in reality in terms of quality of life is degrading and destructive serving the rich powerful Globalist agenda of the governments to make one mass multicultural divisive cess pit over which a one world government can have absolute power over all else such as culture, heritage and tradition and greatness of race, so that oligarchs can make large amounts of money and use up last remaining natural resources. This is all it comes down to. There is nothing moral, ‘humane’ or good about any of this.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)